Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
One's own prior arXiv work should be cited in a neutral, third-person manner—written as 'Prior work [X] proposed...' rather than 'Our previous work...'—to maintain anonymity and avoid self-plagiarism disputes.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAn arXiv paper is not equivalent to a published paper; a paper is considered formally published only after passing peer review and being included in a journal or conference proceedings.64% similarUnverifiedICLR uses a double-blind review process but takes a relatively permissive stance toward arXiv preprints, allowing authors to post papers on arXiv before submission.62% similarUnverifiedWhen reviewers assess novelty, they look at the incremental contribution of the submission relative to all existing literature, and prior arXiv work also counts as existing literature.61% similarUnverifiedJason Calacanis argues that publicly published AI-assisted articles should disclose this in the very first sentence; otherwise it amounts to plagiarism.59% similarUnverifiedAn arXiv paper proposes reframing summarization as extractive sentence selection to address the problem of factual hallucination in generative summarization within biomedical and clinical domains.58% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/940372API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/940372MCP
get_claim(id=940372)