Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
When the same paper is given to different reviewers, the conclusions of acceptance and rejection are often split roughly evenly.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/25/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe results of the NeurIPS 2022 consistency experiment showed that approximately 50% of papers received completely different accept/reject decisions between the two groups of reviewers78% similarUnverified多项实证研究表明顶级会议的接收决定存在显著随机性，估计约50%的被接收论文在重新评审时可能会被拒绝74% similarUnverified研究表明同一篇论文在不同审稿人之间的评分差异可达2-3分（满分10分）74% similarUnverifiedFindings papers go through the same peer review process as main conference papers, but are ranked slightly below the main conference acceptance threshold in the final ranking.70% similarUnverifiedApproximately 23% of papers could not be fully reproduced as claimed, and at least 496 papers had at least one claim that was falsified or disputed.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/949821API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/949821MCP
get_claim(id=949821)