Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the standard for determining threatening speech in the 2023 case Counterman v. Colorado, requiring prosecutors to prove that the speaker had a subjective 'reckless disregard'.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/5/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified2024年美国最高法院在Lindke v. Freed案中裁定，公职人员在特定条件下屏蔽公民可能构成违反第一修正案的行为69% similarUnverifiedThe U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed in multiple rulings that a chilling effect itself can constitute a violation of First Amendment rights.66% similarUnverified在美国民事诉讼中，拒绝配合或隐瞒证据可能构成妨碍司法（Spoliation of Evidence），法庭有权实施制裁，包括不利推定指示或直接判定不利裁决66% similarUnverifiedFederal courts typically apply the "deliberate indifference" standard when determining whether prison conditions are unconstitutional.64% similarUnverifiedRule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence stipulates that a court may exclude evidence if its risk of unfair prejudice substantially outweighs its probative value.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/977189API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/977189MCP
get_claim(id=977189)