Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The reasoning chains of current large language models do not guarantee a faithful reflection of their actual computation process, which constitutes a substantive obstacle in high-stakes surgical scenarios.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified现有大语言模型基本停留在因果阶梯的第一层，无法真正执行干预和反事实的因果推理80% similarUnverifiedGeneral-purpose large language models still have significant shortcomings in rigorous logical reasoning and can hallucinate seemingly plausible but actually incorrect proof steps.80% similarUnverifiedLarge language models cannot provide human-auditable reasoning traces, making it difficult for researchers to determine after the fact where conclusions came from74% similarUnverifiedThe persuasiveness trap of large language models is essentially a calibration failure, as there is no positive correlation between output fluency and factual accuracy.74% similarUnverifiedLarge language models have no genuine introspective access to their own execution traces and can only reconstruct a plausible-looking narrative based on context and training tendencies73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1114089API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1114089MCP
get_claim(id=1114089)