Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The UP host stated that the Qwen3 coding model scored approximately 61.7 on SWE-Bench Pro, while the top-tier closed-source model used as a reference scored 53.4 (this data contains inconsistencies and is for reference only).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/2/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn agentic coding benchmarks such as SWE Bench Pro, Qwen 3.8 reportedly surpasses Opus 4.6 Max on some tasks.78% similarUnverifiedThe fine-tuned Qwen3.5-4B model improved accuracy on BU Bench V1 from 15% to 53%.76% similarUnverifiedIn the Terminal Bench test, Qwen 3.6 27B scored approximately 60.7, while Muse Glimmer scored only 51.7, falling significantly behind.74% similarVerifiedQwen3.6 27B scored 77.2 on SWE-bench Verified.72% similarUnverifiedQwen3.8-Flash-Next achieved scores of 58.7 and 62.5 on the SWE-bench 1.1 and SWE-bench Pro evaluations, respectively.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/932777API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/932777MCP
get_claim(id=932777)