Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the SWE-bench Pro benchmark, the Qwen3 Coder model scored 61.7, while Opus 4.6 MAX scored 53.4.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/16/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn agentic coding benchmarks such as SWE Bench Pro, Qwen 3.8 reportedly surpasses Opus 4.6 Max on some tasks.79% similarUnverifiedThe UP host stated that the Qwen3 coding model scored approximately 61.7 on SWE-Bench Pro, while the top-tier closed-source model used as a reference scored 53.4 (this data contains inconsistencies and is for reference only).78% similarUnverifiedQwen3 27B's scores on several programming and agent benchmarks surpassed those of Claude Opus 4.6.78% similarUnverifiedIn the Terminal Bench test, Qwen 3.6 27B scored approximately 60.7, while Muse Glimmer scored only 51.7, falling significantly behind.73% similarUnverifiedOn the AI Builder model intelligence leaderboard, Claude Opus 5.5 Max topped the rankings with 58 points, Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro ranked 9th with 46 points, and Qwen 3.8 Max ranked 10th with 45 points.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/968239API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/968239MCP
get_claim(id=968239)