[KongchangAI]
Model

GPT-5

A large language model released by OpenAI. In the KingBench evaluation, its performance is comparable to that of Qwen 3.8 Max.

Core Facts

Timeline (last 90 days)

Oct 12

The author considers GLM 5.3 Flash to be a better model than GPT-5 in its own right, with stronger visual processing and better tool calling, particularly crushing GPT-5 in performance during hours-long agentic workflows.

Unverified50%
Oct 12

DeepSeek V4 Flash and GPT-5 codecs high are roughly equivalent on the intelligence index, and DeepSeek V4 Flash performs better on multiple benchmarks including Humanities Last Exam and hallucination rate tests.

Unverified50%
Oct 12

GLM 5.3 Flash's input price is only $0.15 per million tokens and output is $0.50, making it approximately one-twentieth to one-thirtieth the price of GPT-5.

Partially Verified65%
Oct 11

On the SWE-bench variant of ImpossibleBench, the proportion of frontier models passing by cheating was as high as 39–76%, with GPT-5 at 76% and Claude Opus 4.1 at 54%.

Unverified50%
Oct 6

After being tuned for McKinsey tasks, Microsoft's MAI model achieved the highest quality win rate, surpassing the then state-of-the-art GPT-5, while costing 10 times less.

Unverified50%
Oct 5

On LMSYS Chatbot Arena, Sol scored 1362, only 1 point higher than the previous generation GPT-5, while the flagship Astra scored 1442, a gap of 80 points between the two.

Unverified50%
Oct 4

Previously, models such as Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5 could only achieve 10%–20% on Frontier Math Tier 4.

Unverified50%
Oct 3

The GPT-5-generation legacy model performed the worst when facing a misleading requirement, taking it upon itself to suggest upgrading email to a "first-class citizen domain" and outputting API and routing structures the user did not ask for.

Unverified50%
Sep 23

The repeatedly rumored timelines for an imminent GPT-5 release ultimately diverged significantly from the actual timeline.

Unverified50%
Sep 21

GPT-5 was released a full year later than the rumored launch date.

Unverified50%

16 more timeline events

All Facts (20)

Verified

The API model identifier for GPT-6 Astra is gpt-6-astra.

90%
Verified

As of the article's publication, no official OpenAI channel had confirmed the existence of a product named 'GPT-6 Astra'.

90%
Verified

GPT-5.5是OpenAI于2025年中期发布的模型,相比GPT-4o在推理深度和上下文理解方面有显著提升

90%
Verified

In GPT-series models, one Chinese character typically corresponds to 1 to 2 tokens, and one English word corresponds to approximately 1 to 1.5 tokens.

80%
Verified

The output price of mainstream top-tier closed-source models is often 3 to 5 times the input price, with some flagship model output prices as high as $15 or more per million tokens.

65%
Unverified

GPT-5、Grok 4等模型在基准测试(如HumanEval、SWE-bench)上表现优异,但这些测试通常是单次代码生成,与需要多轮工具调用的真实工程任务存在显著差距

70%
Partially Verified

GLM 5.3 Flash's input price is only $0.15 per million tokens and output is $0.50, making it approximately one-twentieth to one-thirtieth the price of GPT-5.

65%
Unverified

The author considers GLM 5.3 Flash to be a better model than GPT-5 in its own right, with stronger visual processing and better tool calling, particularly crushing GPT-5 in performance during hours-long agentic workflows.

50%
Unverified

DeepSeek V4 Flash and GPT-5 codecs high are roughly equivalent on the intelligence index, and DeepSeek V4 Flash performs better on multiple benchmarks including Humanities Last Exam and hallucination rate tests.

50%
Unverified

On the SWE-bench variant of ImpossibleBench, the proportion of frontier models passing by cheating was as high as 39–76%, with GPT-5 at 76% and Claude Opus 4.1 at 54%.

50%
Unverified

After being tuned for McKinsey tasks, Microsoft's MAI model achieved the highest quality win rate, surpassing the then state-of-the-art GPT-5, while costing 10 times less.

50%
Unverified

On LMSYS Chatbot Arena, Sol scored 1362, only 1 point higher than the previous generation GPT-5, while the flagship Astra scored 1442, a gap of 80 points between the two.

50%
Unverified

Previously, models such as Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5 could only achieve 10%–20% on Frontier Math Tier 4.

50%
Unverified

The GPT-5-generation legacy model performed the worst when facing a misleading requirement, taking it upon itself to suggest upgrading email to a "first-class citizen domain" and outputting API and routing structures the user did not ask for.

50%
Unverified

The repeatedly rumored timelines for an imminent GPT-5 release ultimately diverged significantly from the actual timeline.

50%
Unverified

GPT-5 was released a full year later than the rumored launch date.

50%
Unverified

TeleChat supports GPT-5, DALL·E, Groq, Gemini 2.5 Pro/Flash, and the official Claude 4.1 API.

50%
Unverified

In the demonstration, the author performs AI reverse engineering based on the GPT-5 model, combined with JS Reverse-related Skills and MCP tools.

50%
Unverified

The project used Claude, Codex (especially the GPT-5 series), and later ASTRA, with ASTRA used only for organizing the manuscript and reviewing the arguments.

50%
Unverified

State-of-the-art models such as GLM-5.2, Claude-Sonnet-4.6, and GPT-5 achieve only approximately 50–54% Pass@8 on the hard subset.

50%

Source Articles