[KongchangAI]
BenchmarkSWE-bench

SWE-Bench

SWE-Bench is a benchmark dataset constructed by academic researchers for evaluating the software engineering capabilities of AI systems. It collects GitHub issues and corresponding code repair tasks from real open-source repositories, requiring models to automatically generate code patches that pass test cases based on problem descriptions. The benchmark measures an AI system's ability to localize issues, understand code, and perform repairs in real-world software engineering scenarios.

Core Facts

Timeline (last 90 days)

Sep 16

Most mainstream agent evaluation benchmarks (such as Web Arena, SWE-Bench, Gaia, and TerminalBench) assume a static environment in which the environment does not change during evaluation.

Unverified50%
Sep 15

Current mainstream Agent evaluation approaches fall into three categories: task completion rate based on deterministic assertions, LLM-as-Judge, and end-to-end benchmark test sets (such as SWE-Bench and WebArena).

Unverified50%

All Facts (20)

Verified

SWE-bench directly extracts issues and corresponding pull requests from real GitHub open-source projects, requiring AI systems to understand problem descriptions, locate code defects, and generate correct fix patches

90%
Verified

SWE-Bench was released by a research team at Princeton University in 2023.

90%
Verified

SWE-bench was developed by a Princeton University team; the Pro version requires models to locate bugs and generate fix patches within real GitHub repositories.

80%
Verified

SWE-bench was released in 2023 by a research team at Princeton University, collecting 2,294 real GitHub Issues and their corresponding Pull Request fixes from 12 well-known Python open-source projects.

80%
Verified

SWE-Bench collected 2,294 real Issue–Pull Request pairs from 12 mainstream Python open-source projects on GitHub.

80%
Verified

SWE-bench is a software engineering capability evaluation benchmark introduced by a Princeton University research team in 2023.

80%
Verified

SWE-bench (the real GitHub Issue fix rate) is regarded by the industry as the most valuable metric for measuring coding Agent capabilities.

80%
Verified

Mainstream benchmarks for evaluating programming large models include HumanEval, MBPP, SWE-bench, and LiveCodeBench

80%
Verified

SWE-Bench was introduced by Princeton University in 2023 and evaluates AI programming ability by drawing thousands of resolved issues from real open-source projects on GitHub.

80%
Verified

SWE-bench was proposed by Princeton University and contains 2,294 software engineering problems from real GitHub repositories.

80%
Verified

In early 2024, the strongest AI models scored only in the 10%–20% range on SWE-Bench.

65%
Verified

The training data sources for specialized programming models include open-source code from GitHub, competitive programming solutions, technical documentation, and code review records, and the models are optimized for benchmarks such as HumanEval, MBPP, and SWE-bench.

65%
Verified

Devin resolved 13.86% of real GitHub Issues in the SWE-bench test, surpassing the performance of Claude 2.

65%
Verified

SWE-Bench was released by a Princeton University research team and collects real issue reports and their corresponding pull request fix patches from GitHub.

65%
Partially Verified

The SWE-Bench test set contains 2,294 real bug-fix tasks from 12 mainstream Python open-source projects.

80%
Unverified

o3-mini-high在SWE-Bench上修复了39%的错误,允许调用内部工具后成功率飙升到61%

80%
Unverified

2024年初SWE-Bench最好的系统得分仅在30%左右

70%
Unverified

在SWE-Bench等真实软件工程基准中,顶尖模型往往需要平均30-50次工具调用才能完成一个Issue修复

70%
Partially Verified

Projects collected by SWE-bench include well-known Python open-source projects such as Django, scikit-learn, and sympy

65%
Unverified

Most mainstream agent evaluation benchmarks (such as Web Arena, SWE-Bench, Gaia, and TerminalBench) assume a static environment in which the environment does not change during evaluation.

50%

Source Articles