2406 related articles

Real-world testing of Qwen3 27B with DeepSeek Harness agent framework: deployment setup, visual understanding, reasoning intensity comparison, and token consumption data across multimodal tasks.

A deep dive into AI Agent testing vs. traditional testing, covering intent recognition, slot filling, negation handling, prompt design, security testing, plus quantitative metrics like precision, recall, and F1 score.

Explore how Yadda 3.0 combines BDD with AI Agents, using natural language test specs as human-AI acceptance contracts and redefining BDD's role in the AI era.

A complete guide to building an AI-driven testing workbench with five-layer architecture, covering Claude Code agent client setup, DeepSeek model integration, and Node.js environment configuration.

Learn how AI Agents are leading a new software testing paradigm. Covers PyTest framework, Web and API automation, and the full loop from requirements to CI/CD.

Hands-on testing of Meta's open-source 30B Muse Glimmer model across vision, reasoning, and full-stack tasks. Excellent vision but weak logic, D-Spark gives 3x speed at quality cost, 128K context is the biggest limitation.

Deep analysis of Nightcrawler, an AI penetration testing agent running entirely on smartphones. Exploring how on-device AI empowers cybersecurity testing, its architecture, use cases, and risks.

OpenAI's top AI Agent was stress-tested in real business scenarios to see if it could independently run a company. The experiment reveals agent capabilities and limitations in decision-making, memory, and strategic planning.

Deep analysis of how Cekura's five-step closed loop—scenario simulation, failure capture, root cause diagnosis, automatic prompt rewriting, and regression verification—solves voice AI agent quality assurance in production.

API Mock is fast but misses bugs; Sandbox is realistic but costly. This article analyzes their core differences and provides a layered testing strategy for building reliable Agent test systems.

An in-depth look at AI testing challenges. Learn to write reusable Skill packs and master Agent testing and LLM evaluation—covering the SKILL.md six-dimensional rule, skill-creator, EvalScope, and dataset selection.

What is the fundamental difference between terminal agents and device agents? This article breaks down Claude Code's core positioning, the key logic for enterprise AI testing selection, and the advantages of the Claude Code + DeepSeek combination.

An in-depth look at how AI Agents disrupt traditional software testing: the core differences between LLMs and Agents, four capability dimensions (planning/memory/tools/skills), and how testers achieve 10x efficiency gains.

An in-depth look at how AI Agents are disrupting traditional software testing: the core differences between LLMs and Agents, four capability dimensions (planning/memory/tools/skills), and how test engineers can achieve 10x efficiency gains in test case generation.

In-depth analysis of the five core dimensions of AI Agent testing: command safety, tool-calling accuracy, task planning, output consistency, and error self-repair. Master automated testing and the transition path for test engineers.

An in-depth analysis of the five core dimensions of AI Agent testing: command safety, tool-calling accuracy, task planning, output consistency, and error self-repair. Master automated testing methods and the transition path for test engineers.

A developer tests Fan Browser Agent on a real Korean visa application: autonomous flow planning, filling 30+ form fields automatically, and handling upload errors.

A deep dive into DeepAgents' core mechanisms, with a hands-on guide to building a HarmonyOS automated testing Agent — covering create_deep_agent, LangChain comparison, and long-chain task planning.

Full breakdown of a real AI testing pipeline: API collection, doc enrichment, AI test case generation, Agent-driven execution, and test reports — with Skills, RAG, and Harness engineering.

Veta is an open source AI testing agent: just describe your test goal in natural language and it autonomously plans, executes, verifies, and reports Android test results — no scripts needed.