[KongchangAI]
ConceptAgent Loops / 智能体循环

Agent Loop

Agent Loop is a core operational architectural pattern in autonomous agent systems, referring to the working mechanism by which an agent completes complex tasks through continuous cyclic execution of steps such as perception, reasoning, action, and observation. In each iteration, the agent invokes a large language model for reasoning, generates action instructions, calls tools or interacts with the environment, and feeds the results as new input into the next reasoning round until the goal is achieved or a termination condition is met. This pattern is a foundational design principle for agent frameworks such as ReAct and AutoGPT.

Core Facts

Timeline (last 90 days)

Oct 14

Cursor and Claude Code are both based on the same core Agent work loop: read code, make a plan, edit files, run verification, and check results.

Unverified50%
Oct 13

In a cloud Agent architecture, the Agent Loop does not run inside the sandbox; the Agent and the sandbox are separate.

Unverified50%
Oct 11

Both the Claude Agent SDK and the OpenAI Agents SDK take over the Agent Loop, greatly simplifying the model invocation, tool dispatching, history maintenance, and loop control logic that previously had to be written by hand.

Unverified50%
Oct 10

The termination logic of an Agent Loop is to loop until the model no longer initiates any tool calls.

Unverified50%
Oct 10

After receiving a request, the model may return a structured tool call rather than directly providing an answer.

Unverified50%
Oct 10

Large language models are responsible for thinking and decision-making but never directly execute actions themselves; the code outside the model is what actually executes the actions.

Unverified50%
Oct 10

When an application sends a user request to the model, it includes a list of tools the model can use, with each tool having a name and an input schema.

Unverified50%
Oct 10

A turn limit and a budget should be set for the Agent loop to prevent it from getting stuck in an infinite loop and to avoid runaway costs.

Unverified50%
Oct 10

Every round of calls sends the complete conversation history again, so the longer the task, the larger the context, and the slower and more expensive the calls become.

Unverified50%
Oct 6

The essential differences between an Agent Loop and a single LLM API call can be structurally compared across four dimensions: lifecycle, tool invocation, memory, and deliverables.

Unverified50%

27 more timeline events

All Facts (20)

Verified

The underlying operational logic of an Agent Loop is an iterative cycle of 'perception–planning–action–observation.'

80%
Verified

Common termination strategies for Agent Loop include three layers: semantic termination (such as detecting the Final Answer marker), an iteration limit (max_iterations typically defaults to 10–15), and timeout protection (the timeout parameter).

65%
Verified

Each iteration cycle of an Agent consists of three phases—model inference, tool invocation, and result return—and latency accumulates at every step

65%
Unverified

在Agent Loop中如果只将工具结果塞回messages而漏掉assistant消息,模型会陷入无限循环,不断重复调用工具

90%
Unverified

A typical Agent execution loop includes perception, reasoning, action, and observation, forming the ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) pattern

85%
Unverified

Agent Prompt模板通常包含四个部分:System Message、Chat History、User Input和Agent Scratchpad

85%
Partially Verified

Claude Code's Agent Loop is responsible for sending user messages to the Claude model, parsing the tool-call instructions returned by the model, executing tool operations, and feeding the results back to the model for iterative execution.

65%
Unverified

The "Loop" in Loop Engineering and the "Loop" in Agent Loop are not the same concept: the former is a loop of multiple Skill calls and multi-Agent collaboration, while the latter is a loop of tool calls and reasoning.

60%
Unverified

In multi-step tasks, small errors at individual steps accumulate progressively into a snowball effect, where errors in early steps contaminate the input context of subsequent steps

60%
Unverified

The project uses an Agent loop (ReAct architecture) to allow the LLM to autonomously determine the next action based on the current page state, rather than executing pre-set scripts.

60%
Unverified

Cursor and Claude Code are both based on the same core Agent work loop: read code, make a plan, edit files, run verification, and check results.

50%
Unverified

In a cloud Agent architecture, the Agent Loop does not run inside the sandbox; the Agent and the sandbox are separate.

50%
Unverified

Both the Claude Agent SDK and the OpenAI Agents SDK take over the Agent Loop, greatly simplifying the model invocation, tool dispatching, history maintenance, and loop control logic that previously had to be written by hand.

50%
Unverified

When an application sends a user request to the model, it includes a list of tools the model can use, with each tool having a name and an input schema.

50%
Unverified

A turn limit and a budget should be set for the Agent loop to prevent it from getting stuck in an infinite loop and to avoid runaway costs.

50%
Unverified

After receiving a request, the model may return a structured tool call rather than directly providing an answer.

50%
Unverified

The termination logic of an Agent Loop is to loop until the model no longer initiates any tool calls.

50%
Unverified

Large language models are responsible for thinking and decision-making but never directly execute actions themselves; the code outside the model is what actually executes the actions.

50%
Unverified

Every round of calls sends the complete conversation history again, so the longer the task, the larger the context, and the slower and more expensive the calls become.

50%
Unverified

Each interaction in a single LLM call is independent and context does not naturally carry over, whereas an Agent Loop can continuously accumulate state and memory within the loop.

50%

Source Articles