[KongchangAI]
Benchmark

Frontier Code

A third-party programming benchmark maintained by Cognition, the developer of Devin AI. It is designed to measure the capabilities of long-horizon coding agents and is considered closer to real-world production scenarios than HumanEval.

Timeline (last 90 days)

Oct 4

On the Frontier Code reasoning benchmark, the medium reasoning tier performed better than the high and extra high tiers, approaching the max tier; this phenomenon occurred with both Opus and Fable.

Unverified50%
Oct 4

On long-horizon programming tasks such as the Frontier Code benchmark, Opus 5.5 may slightly outperform Astra

Unverified50%
Oct 2

Excessive reasoning can hurt performance, with x-high scoring higher than Max on the Frontier Code benchmark.

Unverified50%
Sep 30

Sonnet 5.5's scores on Frontier Code-related benchmarks have risen from 42 to 46 and 52.

Unverified50%
Sep 25

On Frontier Code, Opus 5.5's medium tier (under $1 per task) actually scored higher than its max tier (over $5 per task).

Unverified50%
Sep 25

On Frontier Code, the performance gap among GPT-6 Sol, Luna, and Opus 5.5 is only about 6–7 percentage points, but their prices range from 10 cents, to $2, to $4.

Unverified50%
Sep 25

In the Frontier Code test, GPT-6 Luna Max achieved 66.6%, with a cost of only 22 cents per task.

Unverified50%
Sep 16

Cognition has released coding model Sway 2, achieving 50.0% on the Frontier Code benchmark, claiming to be within 1 point of stronger models while costing 64% less.

Unverified50%
Sep 12

On the Frontier Code programming benchmark, the old model scored 34.4%, while Gemini 3.7 Flash improved to 43.6%.

Unverified50%
Sep 4

In Cognition's Frontier Code evaluation, Fable 5 ranked first among all frontier models even with only medium reasoning intensity enabled.

Unverified50%

All Facts (10)

Source Articles